26 published accounts of health records lost between providers from 23 countries and territories
Lost between providers, as we file it: the record did not follow the person between providers, systems or countries.
Published January 2025 to September 2026, found in sources in 12 languages: 26 of all 442 cases. By region, 7 in Africa, 4 in the Americas, 3 in Asia, 11 in Europe and 1 in Oceania. Of these, a regulator or court decided 5, the organization involved admitted 4, 12 are allegations not decided and 5 are a person's own account. The sources: 3 decisions by regulators and ombudsmen and 23 reports by edited news outlets. 2 decisions are known to us from a news report of it. The list last changed on October 2, 2026.
Each case is filed under one kind of problem when it is written, by the rule above; the cases here are the ones filed under it. These cases are not a sample: they show what is published and findable, not how common lost records are.
Each case's id links its line on Real cases, the one address to cite. Every case, every kind of problem, by country: Real cases.
By month and region
all cases that monthcases filed as lost between providersa month not yet overevery panel on the same scale, 0 to 15 cases a month
Africa47 cases, 25 countries and territoriesAmericas89 cases, 29 countries and territoriesAsia76 cases, 25 countries and territoriesEurope187 cases, 47 countries and territoriesMiddle East25 cases, 13 countries and territoriesOceania18 cases, 6 countries and territories
Each bar counts the cases whose source was published that month, October 2024 to October 2026, by region. Pick a kind of problem to see its share of each bar. Counts show what was published and what our searches found, not how often problems happen. October 2026 runs only to October 3, 2026, the newest source date, so its bars are drawn as outlines. Every case as a spreadsheet (CSV).
See the numbers
Cases filed as lost between providers, by month of the source and by region
Month
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Oceania
All
October 2024
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
November 2024
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
December 2024
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
January 2025
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
February 2025
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
March 2025
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
April 2025
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
May 2025
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
June 2025
1
1
0
1
0
0
3
July 2025
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
August 2025
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
September 2025
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
October 2025
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
November 2025
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
December 2025
2
0
0
1
0
0
3
January 2026
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
February 2026
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
March 2026
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
April 2026
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
May 2026
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
June 2026
1
1
1
1
0
1
5
July 2026
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
August 2026
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
September 2026
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
October 2026 (so far)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
All
7
4
3
11
0
1
26
Cases filed as lost between providers, by how settled they are and by region
How settled
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Oceania
All
A regulator or court decided
0
0
0
5
0
0
5
The organization admitted the problem
3
0
0
1
0
0
4
Alleged, not decided
1
3
3
4
0
1
12
The person's own account
3
1
0
1
0
0
5
All
7
4
3
11
0
1
26
Cases filed as lost between providers, by kind of source and by region
A patient in East Kalimantan alleges that the records a public hospital sent with his referral abroad were incomplete, including a video of his care cut at crucial moments, and that the referral letter misstated his state of health.
A hospital official said staff left and patient files and data stayed inside after the building was taken over. Displaced patients lost the link to their records and doctors, and some now carry their own papers between centres.
Families say people rescued alive and taken by ambulance were never recorded at any hospital; one was possibly admitted under another name. They say no public, unified register of those rescued in the first hours existed.
A general practice in regional Victoria closed without warning. More than five months later its former patients still could not get their medical records, which remained under the closed practice's control while health agencies sought a fix.
Attendants told the newspaper that public, private and charitable hospitals often refuse a short clinical summary while treatment continues, saying it comes only after formal discharge, leaving families unable to arrange transfers or second opinions.
A health rights coalition said the paper records of patients treated before a national hospital was rebuilt and moved to a new hospital network have disappeared, so earlier test results are unavailable and some studies may need repeating.
A man held in several prisons says that after he was moved to a new prison, staff ignored his medical file, and care arrangements agreed at earlier prisons were dropped.
After a medical practice closed, the former partner holding its records stopped releasing them to patients during a dispute with the other partner. The ombudsman ordered the practice to stop, and an administrative court rejected the appeal.
A clinician at a London hospital trust said its new electronic record system sent referrals to the wrong place, held missing or unreliable information and left patients lost to follow-up. The trust said the rollout caused a number of issues.
A patient released from detention came home with no discharge summary or extract from his records. His family said this made it hard to arrange prompt follow-up care.
A reporter found patients from inland regions carrying bags of scans and test results between hospitals, because regional and university hospital systems do not share data. An older patient said nothing moves unless he hands over paper in person.
Hospital directors and the national hospitals director said there is no single health information system, so a patient may be registered several times, exams are repeated, and transfers between hospitals happen without the patient's information reaching the receiving team.
The dentists' chamber says dental charts and image files do not reach the national electronic record, so other doctors cannot see them. It warns patients may get duplicate prescriptions or repeat imaging as a result.
A private clinic shut without telling patients. Health inspectors reported faults in how it kept patient files, and a patient trying to move to another clinic was refused because no one was left to sign the paperwork.
Former mineworkers home in Lesotho say incomplete mine records and poor coordination between South African and Lesotho authorities leave them without the proof a compensation fund requires. Some say they were refused with no reason given.
After a private hospital stopped public scheme outpatients, transferred patients waited up to seven days for their medical history. The national insurer said it could not reach their data because the hospital was not linked to the national records exchange.
A patient survey found more than one in ten people treated in hospital in 2024 experienced something going, or nearly going, wrong because a provider lacked their medical information. Reported harms included repeat scans and medication errors.
After authorities shut a private clinic network serving social security members, an inside source says surgeries were cancelled and patients were left with doctors who did not know their medical histories. Members were redirected elsewhere.
The health minister said 19 patient files had been reported missing in public hospitals since November 2024, and 349 files and 24 consultation cards were not available when needed because they sat in other departments. All were later found.
A record-system change made in 2023 failed to flag certain messages about discharge reports from other hospitals and specialists. Hospitals identified 3,445 cases needing review. The hospital said an early check found some needed follow-up.
A patient said her earlier care history stayed on paper and was never moved into the national digital record. She also said she cannot easily give a private doctor access to her own record.
In a review of court practice, a clinic could not produce a patient's record for expert review because it was not transferred when two clinics merged. Courts held the successor clinic responsible for keeping it and ordered compensation.
A patient who changed general practitioner says the former doctor did not pass his records to the new one for over six months. Other former patients report the same, and a regional complaint is under review.
A patient asked a public health centre to transfer his file to another clinic. Two months later he was told he had no file there. The ombudsman told the centre to open one and explain his options.
After a long wait for an appointment, a patient was told the specialist could not see a report held at another public hospital and was asked to fetch it herself. The ombudsman recommended records be reachable from every public centre.
A patient told reporters that each new hospital, private then public, made her repeat and pay for routine tests she had already done, because results were not transferable. A records officer said each hospital keeps its own unlinked system.